The Northwest's dreary winters are infamous for inducing depression. 
But being starved for sunlight can do more than kick you into a psychic 
hole. A growing body of evidence suggests it can raise your risk of cancer,
 increase susceptibility to heart attack, diabetes and other disorders, 
and at least partly account for the region's sky-high rates of multiple 
sclerosis.
The reason is vitamin D, an essential nutrient produced in abundance 
by skin exposed to the sun's rays. Long dismissed as being important 
mainly for strong bones, the so-called sunshine vitamin is now 
recognized as a key player throughout the body, including the immune 
system.
Experts say vitamin D deficiency is much more common than previously 
believed — especially in northern climes like Washington, where solar 
radiation from October to March is too puny to maintain healthy levels.
"You're in a dark, gloomy place," said Bruce Hollis, a leading 
vitamin D researcher at the Medical University of South Carolina. "In 
the winter, you could stand outside naked for five hours and nothing is 
going to happen."
Increased use of sunscreen has turned a seasonal shortfall into a 
year-round condition for many people. A recent survey in Britain found 
87 percent of adults tested during winter, and more than 60 percent in 
summer, had subpar vitamin D levels. Doctors in many parts of the world —
 including California — report a resurgence of childhood rickets, soft 
bones caused by lack of vitamin D.
While supplements offer a cheap and easy solution, Hollis and other 
researchers argue the recommended intake is too low to provide many 
health benefits. A Canadian medical organization advises that pregnant 
and nursing women take 10 times the amount suggested in the U.S.
"You're more likely to live longer and you're less likely to die of 
serious chronic disease if you have adequate vitamin D on board," said 
Dr. Michael Holick of Boston University School of Medicine, one of the 
world's top experts. "It may well be the most important nutrient of the 
decade."
Risks of low levels
When Lisa Hill went to her doctor complaining of joint pain, she was 
surprised to get a diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency. "I had never heard
 of it," said the 54-year-old Gig Harbor woman.
Since leaving her native Southern California, her sun exposure has dropped dramatically.
"You're like a little mole in a hole," she said. "You just don't get much sun here."
Many doctors once scoffed at the notion of vitamin D deficiency, but 
testing has become more routine and is covered by most insurance.
University of Washington heart surgeon Dr. Donald Miller Jr. tested 
78 of his patients and found three-quarters had "insufficient" levels of
 vitamin D.
"It was really pretty shocking," said Miller.
In a study of 1,739 Boston-area residents reported last month, rates 
of heart attack, stroke and heart failure were about 50 percent higher 
in those with low levels of vitamin D. In addition to strengthening bones, muscles and joints, high vitamin D
 levels have been linked with lower rates of colon, prostate, breast, 
esophageal and pancreatic cancer. Harvard scientists found that high levels of vitamin D reduced 
children's odds of developing asthma, while researchers in Pittsburgh 
reported that pregnant women with low vitamin D had greater risk of 
preeclampsia, a dangerous form of high blood pressure.
Vitamin D also appears to be one of the reasons multiple sclerosis 
and other autoimmune diseases are twice as common in northern vs. 
southern states. Washington's rate of MS, which causes progressive nerve
 damage, is one of the highest in the nation. Blood samples from more than 7 million military personnel showed 
people with the highest levels of vitamin D were 62 percent less likely 
to develop MS than those with the lowest concentrations. A study in 
Finland found similar results.
What D can do
Formed in skin cells exposed to UVB, the invisible form of light that
 causes sunburn, vitamin D and its breakdown products act throughout the
 body. The compounds are believed to regulate as many as 1,000 genes, 
including genes that weed out precancerous cells and genes that slow the
 runaway reproduction typical of cancer. Molecular geneticist John White and his colleagues at McGill 
University in Montreal discovered vitamin D also switches on an arm of 
the immune system that kills bacteria — including the bug responsible 
for tuberculosis.
"It's a kind of front-line response to infection," he said.
That may explain why TB patients in the early 1900s who basked in the
 sun at sanitariums were often cured, added White, author of a recent 
Scientific American article on vitamin D.
The compound has an anti-inflammatory effect, too, which probably 
plays a role in preventing heart disease and autoimmune disorders.
The evolutionary angle is also being explored, with the suggestion 
that early people who migrated north from the equator lost skin 
pigmentation to maximize vitamin D production. Today, dark-skinned 
people in northern latitudes are among the most vulnerable to vitamin D 
deficiency.
Inconclusive studies
While the evidence is piling up, most of it is still based only on 
association. Scientists count cancer cases, infer or measure vitamin 
intake, then look for correlations. Some researchers advise caution 
until there's more data from controlled trials, where one group gets 
vitamin D, while another gets a placebo.
One such trial last year found 1,000 international units (IU) a day 
slashed cancer risk for women. But a much bigger study found women who 
took vitamin D supplements had the same risk of colon cancer as those 
who didn't. "I would say the jury is out," said Ulrike Peters, who studies 
nutrition and cancer at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.
Women in the large experiment took 400 IU a day of vitamin D — the amount in a typical multivitamin.
Hollis, the South Carolina researcher, says the results simply show that standard doses aren't enough.
The U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends 200 IU a day up to 
age 50, and 400 to 600 IU for older people. The Canadian Paediatric 
Society recently urged pregnant and nursing women to take 2,000 IU a day
 — which the IOM designates as the maximum safe dose.
Vitamin D experts say much higher doses are safe. Exposing just your 
arms and legs to the summer sun for less than 15 minutes can generate 
5,000 IU, Holick pointed out. It is possible to go overboard with supplements and trigger dangerous
 calcium deposits in kidneys and blood vessels, but Holick says it takes
 a lot: more than 10,000 IU a day for a year.
Various studies have linked low 25(OH)D levels to diseases other than 
cancer, raising the possibility that vitamin D insufficiency is 
contributing to many major illnesses. For example, there is substantial 
though not definitive evidence that high levels of vitamin D either from
 diet or from UVR exposure may decrease the risk of developing multiple 
sclerosis (MS). Populations at higher latitudes have a higher incidence 
and prevalence of MS; a review in the December 2002 issue of 
Toxicology
 by epidemiology professor Anne-Louise Ponsonby and colleagues from The 
Australian National University revealed that living at a latitude above 
37° increased the risk of developing MS throughout life by greater than 
100%.
“Scientific evidence on specific effects of vitamin D in 
preventing MS or slowing its progression is not sufficient,” says 
Alberto Ascherio, a nutritional epidemiologist at the Harvard School of 
Public Health. “Nevertheless, considering the safety of vitamin D even 
in high doses, there is no clear contraindication, and because vitamin D
 deficiency is very prevalent, especially among MS patients, taking 
vitamin D supplements and getting moderate sun exposure is more likely 
to be beneficial than not.”
As with MS, there appears 
to be a latitudinal gradient for type 1 diabetes, with a higher 
incidence at higher latitudes. A Swedish epidemiologic study published 
in the December 2006 issue of Diabetologia found that 
sufficient vitamin D status in early life was associated with a lower 
risk of developing type 1 diabetes. Nonobese mice of a strain 
predisposed to develop type 1 diabetes showed an 80% reduced risk of 
developing the disease when they received a daily dietary dose of 
1,25(OH)D, according to research published in the June 1994 issue of the
 same journal. A finish study published 3 November 2001 in The Lancet
 showed that children who received 2,000 IU vitamin D per day from 1 
year of age on had an 80% decreased risk of developing type 1 diabetes 
later in life, whereas children who were vitamin D deficient had a 
fourfold increased risk. 
Researchers are now seeking to understand how 
much UVR/vitamin D is needed to lower the risk of diabetes and whether 
this is a factor only in high-risk groups. There is 
also a connection with metabolic syndrome, a cluster of conditions that 
increases one’s risk for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. A 
study in the September 2006 issue of Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
 demonstrated that in young and elderly adults, serum 25(OH)D was 
inversely correlated with blood glucose concentrations and insulin 
resistance. Some studies have demonstrated high prevalence of low 
vitamin D levels in people with type 2 diabetes, although it is not 
clear whether this is a cause of the disease or an effect of another 
causative factor—for example, lower levels of physical activity (in this
 case, outdoor activity in particular).
People living 
at higher latitudes throughout the world are at higher risk of 
hypertension, and patients with cardiovascular disease are often found 
to be deficient in vitamin D, according to research by Harvard Medical 
School professor Thomas J. Wang and colleagues in the 29 January 2008 
issue of Circulation. “Although the exact mechanisms are poorly
 understood, it is known that 1,25(OH)D is among the most potent 
hormones for down-regulating the blood pressure hormone renin in the 
kidneys,” says Holick. “Moreover, there is an inflammatory component to 
atherosclerosis, and vascular smooth muscle cells have a vitamin D 
receptor and relax in the presence of 1,25(OH)D, suggesting a multitude 
of mechanisms by which vitamin D may be cardioprotective.”
Source:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2290997/
http://seattletimes.com/html/health/2004179538_vitamind13m.html